The Federal Court agreed with Jeffrey M. Jacobson that his client was retaliated for claiming discrimination. Jeffrey M. Jacobson’s client, a DuPage deputy sheriff has a disability. When he notified the Sheriff that he was disabled, they refused to accommodate him, and instead retaliated against him. The accommodation would have cost the Sheriff no money, and it was a quick and simple swap. But, he chose to insist that my client litigate it in court. Now the State’s Attorney is going to spend 100x what the actually cost is to accommodate the deputy. See KOTY v. ZARUBA, CASE NO. 15 C 2600, Federal Court, Illinois, Northern District.
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.